How to benchmark info center energy costs

In the spring of 2007, UPS's Ben Swanson and Joe Parrino attended a conference on the growing problem of notes center ability consumption. One suggested remedy was to benchmark and analyze the capability flowing through the documents center. So after the conference, Swanson, the facilities agency manager, and Parrino, a input center facilities manager, profiled their two main goods centers to learn what they could do to increase their energy efficiency and, ultimately, save money. More on CIO.com Five Ways to Find details Center Energy Savings Good Incentives Boost Data-Center Energy Efficiency Signposts on the Road to goods Center Energy Savings

They found one crucial area to improve: their 65 computer-room air handlers. Parrino and his team found that some of their capability distribution units had perforated tops. "We were losing all sorts of air through the tops of the cabinets," he says, which meant that some of the cool air circulated by the air handlers was being wasted by cooling the PDUs. They restricted the air flow through the cabinets, tested to produce certain they wouldn't overheat, thereupon turned 24 air handlers off.

[ Keep up on green IT trends with InfoWorld's Sustainable IT blog and Green Tech newsletter. ]

The move has saved UPS 1.6 million kilowatt-hours and about $124,160 per year. And that's not all-they plus benchmarked their mechanical cooling system and were able to reduce its energy use, saving an additional $100,000 annually. The mechanical plant of these UPS goods centers consumes about half what a typical input center mechanical plant consumes, according to their benchmarking study, Parrino says.

Despite the potential for savings, however, most IT departments have not rushed to benchmark input center energy efficiency, primarily considering there's no incentive to measure it, says Forrester analyst Doug Washburn. He notes that only 11 percent of IT organizations are responsible for paying their energy-related operating costs (the ability bill typically goes to the facilities group). But that's changing: More CIOs are being asked to reduce energy consumption, Washburn has found, and, as a aftereffect, new metrics-though they come with caveats-appear to help pinpoint which areas of your details center can be optimized.

Two Ways to Benchmark

One such method of measuring energy efficiency, developed recently by the Uptime Institute, a documents center research organization, is Corporate Average Datacenter Efficiency (CADE). that calculation multiplies the efficiency of one's technology by the efficiency of the physical facility. Uptime calculates IT efficiency by multiplying a input center's IT asset utilization rate by the energy efficiency of the servers. It determines the facility efficiency by calculating the amount of space used and multiplying that by the energy efficiency of the building. The higher the CADE number, the more efficient your notes center. that method tends to be best-suited for larger businesses since those usually have the automated monitoring tools to measure server utilization, according to Uptime Institute's Executive Director Kenneth Brill.

Another method-Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE)-was developed

by The Green Grid, a group of technology companies collaborating to improve energy efficiency in goods centers.

The PUE is calculated by dividing the total utility load (the ability coming into your facility) by the total IT equipment load (the potential consumed by switches, routers, servers and related gear). In that instance, the lower the PUE, the better.

Forrester's Washburn warns that while these methods can be effective, the measurements due to calculate the benchmarks can be challenging to obtain. "considering most organizations do not pay for their energy-related IT expenditures, many are not measuring energy consumption-especially on a granular level-which is due to actually calculate your documents center energy efficiency metrics," he says.

Your ROI May Vary

Although the emergence of industry-accepted benchmarks means you can be more convinced you're measuring the right things, Washburn plus notes it's usually larger businesses that benefit from benchmarking. The bigger the documents center, the more energy it consumes and the more likely it will be that you'll have an incentive to reduce consumption. "For smaller businesses, the financial impact may not be as significant, and you can direct your instance elsewhere."

What's more, there isn't sufficient publicly available notes yet for companies to benchmark against each other, so it's hard to know how efficient you can really get. whether you try to compare your energy consumption with another company, peers in your industry might be a good start, says Washburn. But a more relevant comparison would be an organization with a similar-sized documents center and similar server, storage and network needs.

Christian Belady, principle ability and cooling architect for Microsoft Global Foundation Services and Microsoft's representative to The Green Grid, agrees that there are limits to these metrics, specifically for smaller businesses. But he thinks even small organizations can still benefit by benchmarking on a smaller scale. Belady says that once CIOs decide to benchmark their energy usage, they should consider benchmarks such as The Green Grid's PUE or any other metrics that may produce sense for driving the right behavior for their business. "The industry is moving so fast that you can't wait for everyone to have the perfect definition of these metrics," he says.

One key to UPS's benchmarking success, Parrino and Swanson believe, is the support and trust from their CIO, David Barnes, to assemble these decisions. "You need to constantly strive to challenge yourself and be constructively dissatisfied with your own operation," Swanson says.

Whether these metrics come from vendors or industry organizations, Washburn believes that they're a good starting point for benchmarking. "At the end of the day, in most cases you'll be able to use the metrics regardless of which method you chose."

Whether these metrics come from vendors or industry organizations, Washburn believes that they're a good starting point for benchmarking. "At the end of the day, in most cases you'll be able to use the metrics regardless of which method you chose."